A review on the response and management of the plasticizer
The plasticizer crisis had a devastating effect on the “made in Taiwan” (MIT) brand image, and substantially impacted the domestic food and drink industries. On June 3, 2011, the MOEA announced that authoritative certificates were required for the exportation of food products in the five aforementioned categories. 3.4.
Plasticizer incident and its health effects in Taiwan - PubMed
The May 23, 2011, plasticizer incident was one of the most serious food safety issues that ever occurred in Taiwan. Most, if not all, plasticizer-contaminated food items were due to malicious replacement of palm oil with phthalate plasticizer (s) in the cloudy-agent formulas by two upstream manufacturers. The incumbent agencies in Taiwan took
Plasticizer incident and its health effects in Taiwan
The May 23, 2011, plasticizer incident was one of the most serious food safety issues that ever occurred in Taiwan. Most, if not all, plasticizer-contaminated food items were due to malicious replacement of palm oil with phthalate plasticizer (s) in the cloudy-agent formulas by two upstream manufacturers.
Plasticizer Market Worth USD 29.77 Billion by 2030 at 6.0%
Nan Ya Plastics (Taiwan) Market USP Covered . Market Drivers. The global market for plasticizers has registered a major spike in the growth rate in the last few years. The market's growth is
Lawmaker urges rules on plasticizer used in floor mats
Lawmaker urges rules on plasticizer used in floor mats Staff writer, with CNA Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Lin Shu-fen (林淑芬) on Tuesday expressed concern over plasticizer content in floor mats sold in Taiwan and urged the government to make inspections of such products mandatory.
- What happened to plasticizers in Taiwan?
- The May 23, 2011, plasticizer incident was one of the most serious food safety issues that ever occurred in Taiwan. Most, if not all, plasticizer-contaminated food items were due to malicious replacement of palm oil with phthalate plasticizer (s) in the cloudy-agent formulas by two upstream manufacturers.
- How much did the plasticizer incident cost the food industry in Taiwan?
- In the 2011 plasticizer incident, many food companies/stores were severely affected. It has been estimated that approximately $350 million (10 billion NT dollars) were at the expenses of food industry in Taiwan . The confidence of general public on the food safety remains to be restored.
- Are plasticizers rescheduled in Taiwan?
- To reinforce source control of plasticizers, the Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency (TEPA) rescheduled some items of plasticizers from Class 4 to Class 1 (non-biodegradable or bioaccumulative) and Class 2 (carcinogenic, teratogenic or mutagenic) poisons on July 20, 2011.
- Did Taiwan already have a high body burden of plasticizers?
- Because the study was initiated in 2004, the results also imply that the general population in Taiwan may have already had high body burden of plasticizers long before the 2011 plasticizer incident.
- Why did the tfdA remove plasticizer contaminated food items from the market?
- On August 8, 2011, the TFDA announced that all the plasticizer-contaminated food items had been cleared from the market . In order to prevent contamination of plasticizer from reoccurring, the TFDA vowed to protect the general public with more inspection and constant risk assessment on food safety.
- Are plasticizers a 'cloudy agent'?
- A few days later, a second upstream manufacturer, Pin-Han Perfumery Company of Tu-Cheng District in New Taipei CIty, was also identified for illicitly replacing palm oil with DEHP and diisononyl phthalate (DiNP) in the so called “cloudy agents.” Plasticizers are added to plastics to increase their flexibility, durability, and pliability.
